|
The story of Baltimore's Transit
past dates to some point in the 1840's when Omnibuses, basically "urban"
versions of a stagecoach, began running to connect the railroad stations with
the hotels in town. By 1854, the idea of initiating horsecar service along
Baltimore Street had been presented before the City Council, at which point
politics took over, and debates caused the actual construction of the line to be
delayed for several years while the logisitics (mainly financial) were worked
out.
Finally on July 12, 1859, service began on the pilot
line, and the Baltimore Transit story was born. Originally founded by
independent companies, the first of which being the City Passenger Railway,
these companies were in the business of making money off of their lines, an idea
which seems foreign to transit operations today. Throughout the coming decades,
new lines were started serving many points of the city, and even reaching into
undeveloped areas in order to serve as a catalyst to future development. The
lines were laid at a gauge of 5 feet, 4 1/2 inches, the widest gauge in the
country, so that the rails could accomodate wooden wagon wheels from the rough
cobblestone and wood block streets lining the city at that time. The motive
power for the lines from the start of service until about 1890 was the horse,
who depending on the length and grade of the lines, would usually perform a few
trips a day, with rest days given as well. Operators of the cars weren't so
lucky, typically working 6 days of between 13 and 18 hours per
day.
The 1870's and 1880's saw more lines spring
up, reaching off to such exotic places as Hall's Springs (Montebello),
Pikesville, Towson, and Powhatan (Woodlawn), but as the 1880's reached the
midpoint, new emphasis was placed not on the locations to be served, but rather
the motive power to serve them. Professor Leo Daft, in 1885, began an experiment
on the Baltimore & Hampden lines to use electric power to propel former
horsecars along the rather steep and curving line between 40th & Roland and
Oak (Howard) & 25th Streets. Power was supplied through a third rail laid
between the riding rails that supplied power to a locomotive pulling a horsecar.
Although the success of the line is debatable, it is known that the line
reverted to horse power in 1889, as the electrical equipment used by the line
wore out. Still, the experiment did point the way towards the future, and
changes were in store for Baltimore's transit.
Cable cars and electric trolley cars both
debuted around the dawn of the1890's. Although there were already concerns as to
expense involved in constructing and maintaining cable propulsion systems, there
was a general disgust amongst the public for overhead lines being constructed in
the Downtown area, as they were already in abundance, and were in the process of
being relegated to culverts, so while the North Avenue Railway (whose service
began on May 16, 1890) was able to construct an expanding trolley line along the
Northern outskirts of town, Baltimore Traction Company and City Passenger were
left to the expensive task of constructing cable lines to serve the central
areas of the city. Cable sevice began on May 23, 1891 and was an instant success
if only for its novelty. However, upcoming overhead lines began to encroach on
the city's center in 1892, and by May of 1893, had entered the Downtown area by
means of an elevated structure above Northern Central's rail yards along North
Street (Guilford Avenue). Finally, the stage was set for the shape of things to
come, as the cable lines were rather swiftly converted to the overhead electric
system of propulsion, and the duration of the 1890's was spent constructing and
converting lines to the new format, with the last horses pulling cars about 1902
on the Lorraine Cemetery line.
As the new century was dawning, the focus
shifted to the companies themselves, which had consolidated into three companies
in 1898, and then into one by the start of 1900. The United Railways and
Electric was formed as the sole provider of electric streetcar transportation in
the city. The 1900's saw the extension and expansion of service even further, as
well as the construction of several impressive new facilities to house and
maintain the growing fleet of streetcars. For a while, the picture for
Baltimore's transit seemed pretty optimistic, but challenges were on the way,
and would change the course of events for the coming decades. The biggest of
these challenges came in a small package known as an
automobile.
The 1910's were a tumultuous decade for the
city's growing transit system. Introduction of more economical gas-powered
automobiles began to eat away at the ridership of the city's streetcars. As if
that weren't enough, "jitneys:" small, but versatile buses, began to be run by
independent operators, further stifling the UR&E's ability to grow. These
changes were not instant, however, as the system did see some expansion, and it
even tried to fight the jitneys off, by forming its own bus franchise, called
the "Baltimore Transit Company." The advent of the first World War caused
tremendous surges in streetcar ridership, much of which the UR&E was
unprepared for, as the availability of new cars was rationed by the
government.
As the "Roaring 20's" progressed, the
streetcars continued to fall out of favor with the public, whose prosperity in
these times, allowed many of them to purchase their own autos. Buses began to
make further inroads as well, as lines on Charles and Fayette streets were
meeting with increasing success. A "railless car" Trackless Trolley line was
also experimented with as well, lasting nearly nine years. Aside from two
demonstrator cars purchased in 1924, and a fleet of small "Birney Cars" used on
peripheral lines, the UR&E did not purchase any new cars between 1919 and
1930. Ridership continued to fall, and only worsened on the advent of "The Great
Depression" in 1929, as many working class riders found themselves out of their
jobs.
The UR&E's woes worsened into the
1930's, and in 1935, the Baltimore Transit Company (BTC) was formed to try to
resurrect the ailing transit system. At first, the system began a balanced
approach to investing in the purchase of new buses and streetcars, as well as
trackless trolley coaches, a hybrid of the two modes. Studies were conducted to
try to evaluate the best modes for each individual line, and modernization and
expansion were stressed to be able to remain competitive in the difficult
environment.
BTC's biggest shot in the arm came in 1941,
when the US entered World War II. Anticipating the call to arms, BTC had wisely
stored its retired streetcars instead of scrapping them, so it was better
prepared for the effort than UR&E had been in WWI. Rubber and gasoline were
precious items to the war effort, so they were rationed, forcing a massive
number of the public back to the rails for their commutes. No new buses were
able to be ordered from 1942 until mid-1945, but the company was able to secure
a number of modern streetcars during this time, as well as a handful of extra
trackless trolleys. The profits realized by the wartime years were short lived
however, and attitudes on public transit quickly changed in the years following
the war. The control of the BTC by out of town interests concerned with the
Auto, Tire, and Petroleum industries did not help matters at all either, as the
comprehensive rail network was almost entirely dismantled in a mere ten
years.
In the 1950's, the decentralization of the
metropolitan area, caused to futher bleed the heart of the transit system dry.
While the BTC continued to convert rail lines to bus lines (with a few
conversions to Trackless Trolley), with the support of Traffic Engineer Henry
Barnes, in its efforts to save money by avoiding necessary infrastructure
investments, the public continued to abandon the lines for the convenience of
their automobiles. By 1955, only five lines remained to be operated by
streetcars, along with a minor rail shuttle that was converted before year's
end. By 1959, this number was down to only two, albeit among the heaviest routes
in the system. Buses had replaced the rest of the routes, if in fact they
weren't abandoned, as the system tried a desperate effort to reach out into the
ever expanding suburbs in its attempts to regain lost business. Six trackless
lines that had existed at the start of 1956 were all converted by mid-1959 as
well.
Therefore, as the 1960's dawned, the BTC was
in the midst of its own downward spiral. They had desired to convert the
remaining two rail lines to bus, but did not have enough capital to purchase
replacement buses and repave the streets as well. Thus, the streetcars hung on
until November 3, 1963, at which point the system became entirely operated by
buses. However, the buses were no more successful (if not less so) at regaining
ridership to the Baltimore system. BTC had grappled with labor strikes
throughout this period, and each one only detered the remaining ridership on the
system. By the late 1960's, it had become obvious that transit was never going
to be a lucrative, profitable venture, and State takeover became imminent. It
was only a matter of time
The Metropolitan Transit Authority (later
renamed the Mass Transit Administration, always referred to as the "MTA") took
over the operation of the BTC on April 30, 1970, and began a modernization
program just as the BTC had done 35 years earlier. MTA purchased new buses and
absorbed the operations of many small suburban carriers as well, to expand its
service as far Southward as Annapolis. The system's expansion, as well as an
energy crisis in the mid-1970's did help to boost ridership in the early years.
As a result, further expansion continued, largely in the form of Park & Ride
services to try to lure commuters from their cars.
The 1980's saw periods of expansion and
contraction, as in 1982, MTA purchased its first wheelchair-lift equipped buses
to accomodate persons with disabilities. In 1983, the Baltimore Metro subway
line opened its first phase, returning rails to the city's transit picture for
the first time in twenty years. The Metro was extended over its second phase in
July of 1987, heading to Owings Mills. But as the 1980's began to draw to a
close, a tough economic environment saw the discontinuance of many marginal bus
services. This trend continued into the early 1990's, combined with fare
increases to cover escalating operating costs.
The 1990's saw a number of changes as well.
In 1992, streetcars retuned to Baltimore in the form of new light rail vehicles
running from Timonium to Camden Station, later to be extended several times. A
final addition was made to the subway line to extend service in 1995 to Johns
Hopkins Hospital. And in 1996, the fare structure was changed to eliminate the
transfer, as the $3.00 All-Day Pass was initiated. The changes of the 1990's
have met with some success. Bus ridership is growing at a slight rate, and the
light rail line is measured as a success as well. MTA's commuter rail arm, known
as MARC, is trying to build upon a faithful following as well, and at the advent
of this new millenium, Baltimore's transit is holding its own for the time
being, and doing a pretty good job at it.
The Baltimore enthusiast is blessed to have
a number of printed works that tell many specifics of the story of public
transporation in the city. Among them are:
Baltimore's Streetcars, based on the
book Who Made All Our Streetcars Go?, by Michael R.
Farrell
Baltimore Streetcars 1905-1963: The
Semi-Convertible Era, by Sachs, Nixon, and Cox
The Best Way to Go, The History of the
BTCo, by Father Kevin Mueller
Motor Coach Age, Baltimore : Parts
1-3, published by the Motor Bus Society
Baltimore Streetcar Routes, by
Kenneth Morse
This list is by NO means complete, as a number
of other works are also available for the Baltimore transit enthusiast. Visit or
contact the Baltimore Streetcar Museum for more information on rail-related
works, and contact the Motor Bus Society for information concerning buses and
trackless trolleys in the
city.
|